Interviews under caution – Police and Criminal Evidence Act

Posted by Jonny on Oct 29, 2016 in Latest News, Latest News
John Dyne

John Dyne, Director


Interviews under Caution

We have encountered numerous occasions where people have attended interviews under caution without their Solicitor. For the most part they assumed they could handle the interview because they were innocent and had nothing to fear or perhaps being accompanied by a Solicitor implied they had need of legal representation because they had something to hide. Either that or they did not understand the significance of the interview or the potential consequences. After all the letter of request can seem rather innocuous and almost friendly – an invitation to a voluntary interview “to give your side of the story”.

But what exactly is the regulator hoping to achieve though the interview? The interview should not be used as a fishing expedition. This is not the purpose of an interview under caution and suspects have the right not to self-incriminate themselves. Ensuring the suspects’ rights are protected is the primary reason a suspect should always be legally represented at interviews under caution.

Remember when the regulators – that is the Police, Health & Safety Executive, Tradings Standards, Environment Agency, Natural Resources Wales or DVSA request an interview it is because they are thinking of bringing criminal proceedings against you or your company. Sentences for many road transport and most  environmental and Health & Safety Offences offences carry unlimited fines and environmental offences a custodial sentence of up to 5 years. A single conviction can potentially lead to revocation of your operator licence or environmental permit. As an  operator of HGVs or PCVs you have to report health & safety, road transport or environmental convictions to the Office of the Traffic Commissioner. In all cases the message is simply this – see an experienced regulatory Solicitor and if you decide to attend the interview take that Solicitor to the interview with you.

You may be familiar with the words of a caution from crime based television drama but what exactly do those words mean?

“You do not have to say anything.” The person under investigation has the right to remain silent and is entitled to give no comment answers to questions put in interview. However, an adverse inference may be drawn from the refusal to attend an interview or to offer no comment to the questions put at interview because it will be said in reality you had no answer that would stand scrutiny so you stayed away/ relied on your right to silence.

“But it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something which you later rely on in court.” If you rely on anything later at trial that you might reasonably have mentioned earlier at interview an adverse inference could be drawn – that is, you are now making the whole thing up and your defence is fabricated.

“Anything you do say may be given in evidence.” Anything said during an interview can be used in evidence at any subsequent trial.

Alternatively, you can provide a prepared written statement. This statement can be drafted with the help of your Solicitor and can be useful and convenient means of managing and controlling the evidence given at interview and perhaps avoid answering any direct questions without any adverse inferences being drawn.

There is a potential risk of arrest if an individual declines to accept the invitation to attend a voluntary interview. Didn’t it somewhere mention the interview was voluntary?! All offences are potentially arrestable but the lawfulness of an arrest by a police constable for an offence is dependent on the constable having reasonable grounds for believing it is necessary to arrest the person. This may arise when it is thought that unless the suspect is arrested they will not attend the voluntary interview. In my experience of regulatory work in Transport, Health & Safety and Environmental cases the use of the power of arrest or threat of arrest is still comparatively rare and then arrest has only arisen after a threat (of arrest) was first made. Arrest or attempts to arrest have occurred even when a prepared statement had already been provided and even after giving written explanations and an open offer to cooperate with the investigation. It is highly important for any organisation relying on a permit or licence for their business to consider how a refusal to answer questions may look to their regulator (e.g. the Traffic Commissioner or any reviewing panel).

So how should you handle the interview? Give no comment answers? Answer all the questions put to you? Provide a prepared statement – with or without further comment to questions? Go it alone? Instruct a Solicitor?

My advice is never go it alone but instruct a Solicitor with knowledge of all the legal issues at large. The approach to then take at the interview simply depends on the circumstances. All cases are very fact specific. There are no hard and fast rules. A well managed interview needs careful planning, preparation and an early request for pre-interview disclosure. An experienced regulatory solicitor can help you prepare for the interview and if you are a company help decide who best to attend the interview. Remember anything you say can be used against you so a company faced with a choice should always consider who best to represent it. The potential outcomes of a criminal investigation can be catastrophic. Time spent in preparation for interview with an experienced regulatory solicitor is never wasted.  Time spent in preparation may enable you to provide an explanation sufficient to dissuade the regulator from prosecuting you or your company – with the regulator taking no further action. From a commercial perspective this would obviously be an attractive outcome as defending prosecutions can be costly, stressful and very time consuming and nowadays there is limited ability to recover costs even if you win your case.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Trade Licenses for Trade Plates – “red on white stop on sight”

Posted by Jonny on Oct 29, 2016 in Latest News
John Dyne, Transport Lawyer. Secretary to HTA and BSA

John Dyne, Transport Lawyer. Secretary to HTA and BSA

I can’t now recall who is attributed to the saying “red on white stop on sight” but I think it was a Judge sitting on a trade plate case many, many years ago. I rather think the saying has more to do with picking up delivery drivers holding up trade plates on the roadside than a team leader’s mantra delivered fora pre-roadside enforcement pep talk.

I have had some enquiries about trade plates so I thought I would do a short piece on the law concerning trade licenses for trade plates.Trade licence plates can save you time and money if you’re in the motor industry – you won’t have to register and tax every vehicle temporarily in your possession. You need to apply to DVLA for a trade licence to be able to use trade plates.

If you possess a trade licence for a trade plate then that is an important and valuable asset. There is no automatic right to the issue of a trade licence and there are reserved only for those meeting very strict criteria.

To be eligible for a trade licence you must either be a motor trader or a vehicle tester. A motor trader is entitled to use the trade licence on mechanically propelled vehicles only if they are temporarily in their possession in the course of their business. A motor trader who is a manufacturer may also use the licence on a vehicle kept only for research and development purposes, or on vehicles that are submitted to them for testing by other manufacturers. A vehicle tester may use the trade licence only on vehicles submitted to them for testing (including the vehicle’s trailer, its accessories or equipment).

A Motor Trader is defined as:

• a manufacturer or repairer of, or dealer in, mechanically propelled vehicles, or
• a dealer in vehicles, if they carry on a business consisting wholly or mainly of collecting or delivering mechanically propelled vehicles and not including any other activities except those of a manufacturer or repairer of or dealer in such vehicles.

Vehicle Testers are defined as:

• a person other than a motor trader who regularly in the course of their business engages in the testing on roads of mechanically propelled vehicles belonging to
other people.

The majority of operators of HGVs, PCVs, Plant and Mobile Cranes should in theory be entitled to apply for and receive Trade Licences under the ‘repairer of ‘ pre-qualification as most if not all will have a workshop and will carry out repairs but they will be constrained by the ‘temporarily in their possession’ qualification. Most of the vehicles worked on in the workshop may well be in the regular fleet. It might  pay to have the haulage side of the business separate from the repair and maintenance side so the repairers are only in temporary possession of the vehicle when it comes to them for repair.  The regulations specifically cater for the movement of semi-trailers (which are obviously not mechanically propelled vehicles) where the vehicle and the semi-trailer are taken to constitute a single vehicle. However it does not appear that any  provision is made for a draw bar trailer configuration where a substantial part of the weight of the trailer will not be borne by the mechanically propelled vehicle.

The pre-qualification that the business must consist wholly or mainly of collecting or delivering mechanically propelled vehicles applies to a dealer in vehicles with the exception that they can also be a manufacturer or a repairer. According to Government Guidance ‘dealer in vehicles’ includes hire and leasing companies and also finance/HP companies which presumably comes as an extra statutory concession because such businesses clearly do not consist of wholly or mainly collecting or delivering vehicles for manufacture or repair..

There are a limited set of purposes for which a motor trader may use a vehicle on a public road by virtue of a trade licence which are

(a) business purposes (i.e. used for purposes connected with the motor trader’s business);
(b) paragraph 12 purposes; and
(c) purposes that do not include the conveyance of goods or burden of any description except specified loads (e.g. for testing purposes /vehicle for the return journey).
Paragraph 12 purposes include any of the following purposes—

(a) for its test or trial or the test or trial of its accessories or equipment, in either case in the ordinary course of construction, modification or repair or after completion;
(b) for proceeding to or from a public weighbridge for ascertaining its weight or to or from any place for its registration or inspection by a person acting on behalf of the Secretary of State;
(c) for its test or trial for the benefit of a prospective purchaser, for proceeding at the instance of a prospective purchaser to any place for the purpose of such test or trial, or for returning after such test or trial;
(d) for its test or trial for the benefit of a person interested in promoting publicity in regard to it, for proceeding at the instance of such a person to any place for the purpose of such test or trial, or for returning after such test or trial;
(e) for delivering it to the place where the purchaser intends to keep it;
(f) for demonstrating its operation or the operation of its accessories or equipment when it is being handed over to the purchaser;
(g) for delivering it from one part of the licence holder’s premises to another part of his premises, or for delivering it from his premises to premises of, or between parts of premises of, another manufacturer or repairer of or dealer in vehicles or removing it from the premises of another manufacturer or repairer of or dealer in vehicles direct to his own premises;
(h) for proceeding to or returning from a workshop in which a body or a special type of equipment or accessory is to be or has been fitted to it or in which it is to be or has been painted, valeted or repaired;
(i) for proceeding from the premises of a manufacturer or repairer of or dealer in vehicles to a place from which it is to be transported by train, ship or aircraft or for proceeding to the premises of such a manufacturer, repairer or dealer from a place to which it has been so transported;
(j) for proceeding to or returning from any garage, auction room or other place at which vehicles are usually stored or usually or periodically offered for sale and at which it is to be or has been stored or is to be or has been offered for sale as the case may be;
(k) for proceeding to or returning from a place where it is to be or has been inspected or tested; or
(l) for proceeding to a place where it is to be broken up or otherwise dismantled.

Business purposes are defined in a limited manner which could potentially catch a Motor Trader out if they have business activities that are wider than simply being a manufacturer or repairer of, or dealer in mechanically propelled vehicles and they use a vehicle on trade plates for those wider activities.

A vehicle is used for “business purposes” if it is used for purposes connected with the motor trader’s business—
(a) as a manufacturer or repairer of or dealer in vehicles,
(b) as a manufacturer or repairer of or dealer in trailers carried on in conjunction with his business as a motor trader,
(c) of modifying vehicles (whether by the fitting of accessories or otherwise); or
(d) of valeting vehicles.

The use of trade plates cannot extend to wider uses not covered by the business purposes criteria.

If you are affected by any of the issues raised in this publication please do not hesitate to contact us.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Appealing Fixed Penalty Notices

Posted by admin on Feb 26, 2015 in Latest News

How they work

An increasing number of offences are now dealt with my way of a Fixed Penalty Notice. Offences can cover anything from vehicle defects, through to tachograph offences or no insurance.

Action to Take – Payment or Appeal to Court

Advice should be sought immediately from a specialist transport solicitor on any occasion a Fixed Penalty Notice is received.

Operators and drivers should consider carefully what to do regarding a Fixed Penalty Notice.  It is all too easy just to pay the small fine and not challenge it, even when you are innocent of the alleged offence.

However, both operators and drivers need to consider the regulatory action which could result from just paying the fixed penalty.  In other words, for an operator it could lead to a Public Inquiry and for a driver it could lead to Driver Disciplinary Hearing.  Both could result in disciplinary action being taken on the respective licences of the company or driver, which could include either suspension or loss of the licence.

Anyone receiving a fixed penalty notice has up to 28 days to decide whether to appeal it or pay it.  If you appeal the notice, then a court summons will be issued in due course and you are able to then put forward your defence at Court.

Going to Court

To appeal the matter to Court, individuals need to complete the relevant section of the fixed penalty notice and return it to VOSA/Police without any payment.  This must be done within 28 days of the notice being issued.


Assisting operators with DVSA investigations

Posted by admin on Feb 26, 2015 in Latest News

If the DVSA has arranged to come to your operating centre to look at your records or has arranged to have an interview with you under caution (PACE interview) then you need to be best prepared.  These are important situations which can have serious consequences for your business.


If either of these events has, or are about to happen, then you need to appreciate that you are high up on the DVSA’s radar.   You are at risk of facing a thorough investigation, prosecution or a Public Inquiry and, in many instance, all three.


You should comprehensively review your internal systems for ensuring compliance.


You should to seek specialist advice at the earliest opportunity.  Time and money invested at this stage will prevent, or minimise, costs at a later date.


With its experience of the whole process from investigation through to public inquiry, Dyne Solicitors is best placed to help you make the whole process as risk free and stress free as possible.


Defending Prosecutions

Posted by admin on Feb 26, 2015 in Latest News

Receiving a Summons


Generally, the first notification of a hearing is the summons which normally arrives in the post.  The correspondence will set out the details of where and when the case is to be heard.


The summons sets out the alleged offence and the date and location it is said to have occurred.  It is also likely that the prosecution includes its evidence, such as witness statements, photographs, weighbridge results or tachographs – depending on the offence.  The summons will also outline the prosecution costs which are being asked for.


Most traffic offences will be dealt with in the Magistrates Court but some more serious offences, such as death by dangerous driving, will end up in the Crown Court.

Attending Court


Most Court hearings will be listed at either 10am or 2pm.  Often a number of matters are listed at the same time and so defendants will have to wait around until their case is heard.

Who decides your case?


If the case is heard in the Magistrates’ Court then the matter will be heard by either three magistrates or a District Judge.


The three magistrates are usually lay people and aren’t legally trained, whilst District Judges will be qualified lawyers.  Both magistrates and District Judges are assisted by a legal advisor, whose job it is to ensure that procedures are adhered to and that the magistrates are properly directed as to the law.

Entering plea


At the first hearing, a defendant is usually expected to enter either a Guilty or Not Guilty plea.  In unusual circumstances, no plea may be entered and the hearing adjourned.


If a Guilty plea is entered then it is likely that sentencing will take place that day.


If a Not Guilty plea is entered, then the matter will be adjourned for either a Case Management Hearing (prior to Trial) or a Trial .


A defendant can change their plea from Not Guilty to Guilty at any time they wish, but the earlier they enter a Guilty plea the more discount they will receive on their sentence.

The Trial / Sentencing Hearing


In both situations, the prosecution will set out its case first.  If it is a trial then this will be actioned through witnesses giving evidence.  If it is a sentencing hearing then the prosecutor will just read a summary of the facts of the case.


Next, the defence will put its case forward.  If this is a trial then it will, again, introduce evidence through witnesses.  If it is a sentencing hearing then the defence will just be providing mitigation which may, or may not, require the use of witnesses.


The decision


The magistrates or district Judge may well retire at the end of the case to make their decision, In complex cases you may not learn the outcome until a few weeks later but this is rare.


Once the magistrates or district judge have made their decision they will return to the court room to pronounce their decision.

Potential sentences


There are sentencing guidelines in the magistrates’ courts which provide rules on the type of sentence each offence should receive.  Depending on the positive and negative features of the particular offence,  the sentence will move up or down the range of available sentences.


An experienced lawyer should know what evidence is likely to persuade a court that an offence should be dealt with leniently and what evidence is not important.  The unrepresented individual may have some great mitigation to explain why they committed the offence but not appreciate its relevance and therefore leaving themselves with a more severe punishment than they deserve because it is never communicated to the Court.


The major difference between the driver and operator of a commercial vehicle and a private motorist lies in the fact that any conviction arising out of the use of a commercial vehicle may be reported to the Traffic Commissioner and there may be further sanctions, including the loss of an Operator’s licence. The action taken by the Traffic Commissioner will depend upon the nature of the offence, and, of course, the size of the penalty will be seen as a clear indicator of the perceived gravity of the incident.


The transport operator is, therefore, in a unique situation facing the possibility of a double penalty for a single offence: with the potential for the second penalty to have a far greater impact than the first.


Notwithstanding that threat, an operator can see many offences as being no more than part and parcel of the risks arising from the daily operation of commercial vehicles and, for that reason, will want to spend as little time and money on the problem as possible, but the fact that a conviction is likely to be reported should never be forgotten.


Another very real risk arises from the fact that many judges, understandably, have no knowledge either of the workings of a commercial vehicle, or of the administrative requirements of a haulage undertaking. Add to this, the fact that commercial vehicles and their drivers are always portrayed in the worst possible light and generally are blamed for any problem on the road. Unhappily many courts appear to welcome the opportunity to ‘strike a blow for the public’ and impose penalties that are disproportionate to the alleged offence.


It is against this background that an operator needs to decide whether or not the cost of representation in the court is likely to be justified by the result. The purpose of representation is to try to make sure that the court understands the circumstances in which the alleged offence came to be committed. In a case of overloading, for instance, whether in relation to the permitted axle weight or to the permitted train weight, the load may have been put on the vehicle many miles away from the operating centre, and it is not unknown for a customer to mis-describe the weight of a load.


Equally, the responsibility for the repair of, or for the maintenance of, a vehicle may have been contracted out to a company whose reputation was excellent even if a subsequent check by the enforcement authorities found faults.


These facts need to be explained to the court in sufficient detail to enable the court to understand the difficulties faced by the operator. It should be the job of the representative to persist with the explanation even if the court is initially hostile. It is arguable that a court appearance should be seen as an opportunity to educate both the court and the public. The fact is that the cost of representation is nearly always a justifiable expense



How many cameras are watching motorists?

Posted by admin on Feb 26, 2015 in Latest News

As you drive down the motorway, have you thought that there seem to be a lot of cameras monitoring your journey?

Well, that’s because there are!  There are approximately 20 different kinds of devices in use on British roads.  Here we try to explain what they are and how they work:


  • DS2


These speed cameras are semi-permanent installations and can cover two lanes of traffic travelling in different directions. DS2 traffic cameras can be attended or left unattended whilst enforcing the speed limit.

DS2 speed camera sites work via three piezo strips either on top of the road surface or embedded within the surface of the road. The piezo sensors are set approximately 1m apart and are accompanied by a short grey post on the roadside. When in use the DS2 site is connected to the safety camera partnership van or unmarked car. Autovision can then be used to provide video evidence of the speeding offence. Alternatively, the Police will operate with a police car further along the road, and a message will be sent with details of the offending vehicles registration details to stop and issue the speeding offence.


  • DVLA and DVSA Cameras


The DVSA has a network of mobile and static cameras to monitor whether goods vehicles have paid the HGV Road User Levy.


  • Gatso


These are rear-facing speed cameras.  They work by emitting a radio signal which bounces back off your vehicle.  The time between the signal being sent and the reflection is measured.  A second radio signal is sent out and the time recorded.  The vehicle speed is calculated using this information.  A photograph is taken and automatically sent to the enforcement office.


  • Hadecs 3


These were introduced by the Highways Agency and record average speed over a specific distance.  Hadecs are used to patrol sections of the motorway with variable the speed limits e.g. M1, M6 and M25. They enforce reductions in the limit in an effort to keep the traffic flowing during busy times. This is the ‘smart’ motorway ideal.


  • Highways Agency CCTV


The Highways Agency has 1,500 cameras to assist with management of traffic.  The Cameras record traffic flow and how roads cope with it, but they don’t store data on individual vehicles.


  • Mobile Camera


These are devices held by police officers on the side of the road or mounted in a van.  They use either laser or radar technology to catch speeding vehicles.


  • Peek


These use radar to measure your speed and are similar to a Gatso.  They will take a picture of the rear of your vehicle if you are speeding.


  • Police Automatic Number Plate Recognition


These record number plates of every passing vehicle.  The information can be accessed for up to two years and is used to help detect, deter and disrupt criminality.




These are average speed cameras which are equipped with Automatic Number Plate Recognition.  They photograph every vehicle which passes beneath them.  The information is sent to another set of cameras further down the road.  The time it takes for a vehicle to pass between the two points is used to calculate the vehicle speed.


  • SpeedCurb


These work by sensors embedded in the road triggering a camera to take a photograph when a vehicle passes over them too quickly. The cameras use three piezo sensors embedded into the road which are spaced out by 1 metre. When a vehicle drives over the sensors the time between each sensor is time

They are often used to monitor traffic light offences as well as speeding offences


  • SpeedSpike


These are currently on trial in Hampshire and uses Automatic Number Plate Recognition.  Each time your vehicle passes the camera, the number plate is read and time-stamped together with the camera’s information.  The 1000 cameras can be linked so as to monitor your whole journey on main roads across the country in a similar way to an average speed camera on the motorway.


  • Traffic light Camera


These take a photograph of any vehicle which passes through a set of traffic lights which are on red.


  • TrafficMaster


These cameras measure traffic speeds and congestion.  They are operated by a private company. If you have TrafficMaster, the information is sent to your Sat Nav to enable it to advise you of a better route.


  • Truvelo


These are forward facing speed cameras.  They do not ‘flash’ in the same way as a Gatso.   There are four sensors in the road which when driven over measure the vehicle speed.  These are linked to the camera which, because they are forward facing, will show the face of the driver on the images.


  • Truvelo d-Cam


These are updated versions of the Truvelo.  The only difference being that the images are transmitted automatically to the enforcement office without the need for a person to collect and replace the film.


  • Vector


These speed cameras work in the same way as SPECS speed cameras by measuring the average speed of your vehicle between two or more locations by using Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR).  They were launched in 2014.

They can also help with bus lane enforcement, red light enforcement, yellow box violations, and congestion charging.


  • Watchmen


Watchman speed cameras are rear facing roadside cameras similar to Gatso speed cameras.  They use radar to detect speeding vehicles. They are currently on trial awaiting type approval, prior to a national installation programme. They also feature a second camera for Number Plate Recognition.


Whether you like them or hate them, cameras are here to stay.  This is good evidence of their benefits.  Independent research by Professor Allsop, of University College London, found that:


  • Deployment of speed cameras leads to appreciable reductions in speed in the vicinity of the cameras, and substantial reductions in collisions and casualties there over and above the likely effect of regression to the mean.


A review of 35 studies worldwide of the efficacy of speed cameras concluded that:

‘the consistency of reported reductions in speed and crash outcomes across all studies show that speed cameras are a worthwhile intervention for reducing the number of road traffic injuries and deaths.”

For advice on transport law, contact Jared Dunbar at Dyne Solicitors on 01829 773 100.

Content is believed to be correct at time of writing.  Content written on 29.01.15.



Successfully beating a speeding ticket

Posted by admin on Feb 26, 2015 in Latest News

A driver who was issued with a speeding ticket recently managed to successfully defend himself.

The driver was alleged to have been travelling at 36 mph in a 30 mph zone.  After receiving a photograph of the incident, he visited the location of the alleged offence.  Whilst there he noticed that the distance between the white road markings used to calculate his speed seemed short. On measuring them, it turned out they were approximately three inches shorter than they should have been.

The magistrates’ court accepted that the shorter lines made it appear that he was going faster than he actually was and the case was dismissed.

Jared Dunbar comments: “this case highlights the benefits of thoroughly investigating the details of an alleged offence, particularly when you are certain you didn’t commit that offence.  Fortunately this driver did this and successfully challenged his ticket.  However, not all members of the public will know the rules adequately to be able to undertake such a process themselves.  It shows there is merit in investigating prosecutions thoroughly before blindly paying a fine.  Although it is often difficult to challenge the veracity of a machine, it goes to confirm the adage of Garbage In, Garbage Out.

For advice on transport law, contact Jared Dunbar at Dyne Solicitors on 01829 773 100.

Content is believed to be correct at time of writing.  Content written on 22.01.15.



MOT Consultation

Posted by admin on Feb 26, 2015 in Latest News

Consultation on the Exemptions from the Heavy Goods Vehicle (HGV) Roadworthiness Testing Scheme

The Department for Transport is proposing to remove or modify the exemptions to the requirement to be fitted with a Ministry Plate and undergo an annual roadworthiness test (MOT).  This covers 10 different categories of vehicle and is estimated to affect approximately 40,000 vehicles, including breakdown vehicles, mobile cranes and road construction vehicles.

These are the same exemptions as were proposed in 2009/10, although at least two exemptions are now proposed for modification rather than removal as a result of the new EU Directive.

The removal of the exemptions may affect the legal operating weight of certain vehicles: these include Mobile Batching Plant (Volumetrics) and Mobile Concrete Pumps.

The consultation closes in early March and those affected by the changes are entitled to respond to the consultation.  The consultation can be found at:


For advice on transport law, contact Jared Dunbar at Dyne Solicitors on 01829 773 100.

Content is believed to be correct at time of writing.  Content written on 22.01.15.



End of driving licence counterpart

Posted by admin on Feb 26, 2015 in Latest News

The DVLA’s business plan 2014-15 confirms that the DVLA will stop issuing the paper-based counterpart to the photocard driving licence from January 2015.

This proposal was first announced in 2011 and was seen as an attempt to minimise red tape and expenditure for motorists and the authorities. At the time, Transport Secretary, Justine Greening, said: “Motorists shouldn’t have to keep numerous bits of paper just to prove they can drive and have bought insurance – we live in a digital age and we need to embrace that.”

No action will be required by drivers, although they will be permitted to destroy the counterpart if they so choose. The photocard element will remain valid and unchanged

The DVLA’s online driver enquiry service will provide customers with a 24/7 online access to their driver entitlements. This service will replace the requirement for a paper counterpar.t

For advice on any transport law issues, contact Jared Dunbar on 01829 773 105

Contents believed to be correct at time of writing and article written on 23.09.14



DVSA driver warning for 7.5T

Posted by admin on Feb 26, 2015 in Latest News

DVSA warns Drivers they can’t drive a 7.5T vehicle

even if they have the entitlement on their licence,

without a Driver CPC

The DVSA has recently warned drivers that they can’t legally drive a 7.5T vehicle professionally, even if the entitlement is showing on their driving licence, unless they have completed the Driver CPC.

Drivers issued with a car licence before 1996 automatically have a C1 entitlement on their licence.  This allows them to drive a vehicle up to 7.5T professionally.  However, since the introduction of the Driver CPC this month, the entitlement no longer exists unless a driver has completed the Driver CPC training (or is exempt for some reason).

For advice on any transport law issues, contact Jared Dunbar on 01829 773 105

Contents believed to be correct at time of writing and article written on 22.09.14

Copyright © 2019 Solicitors 4 Transport. All Rights Reserved.
Theme by Lorelei Web Design.